A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals by Jonathan Bennett

, , Comments Off on A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals by Jonathan Bennett

By Jonathan Bennett

Conditional sentences are one of the such a lot exciting and complicated positive aspects of language, and research in their which means and serve as has vital implications for, and makes use of in, many components of philosophy. Jonathan Bennett, one of many world's top specialists, distils a long time' paintings and educating into this Philosophical consultant to Conditionals, the fullest and so much authoritative remedy of the topic. an excellent advent for undergraduates with a philosophical grounding, it additionally deals a wealthy resource of illumination and stimulation for graduate scholars philosophers.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals PDF

Similar logic & language books

Philosophical Theories of Probability

This booklet provides a accomplished and systematic account of a number of the philosophical theories of chance and explains how they're similar. It covers the classical, logical, subjective, frequency, and propensity perspectives. Donald Gillies even presents a brand new conception of likelihood -the intersubjective-a improvement of the subjective idea.

The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy (Open Court Classics)

On hand for the 1st time in two decades, listed here are very important works from the Twenties by way of the best-known consultant of the Vienna Circle. within the Logical constitution of the realm, Carnap adopts the placement of “methodological solipsism” and indicates that it's attainable to explain the realm from the instant info of expertise.

Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (S U N Y Series in Philosophy)

An ingenious and fascinating exposition of topics from Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, this e-book is helping readers locate their method round the "forest of feedback" that make up this vintage. Chapters on language, brain, colour, quantity, God, worth, and philosophy enhance a huge subject matter: that there are lots of sorts of language use--a style philosophy must examine yet has a tendency to miss.

The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic

The Boundary Stones of idea seeks to safeguard classical good judgment from a few assaults of a generally anti-realist personality. Ian Rumfitt is sympathetic to a few of the premisses underlying those assaults. certainly, he regards a few of them as potent demanding situations to definite rules of classical semantics, particularly the main of Bivalence.

Additional info for A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals

Example text

It suggests to us that the person saw the other proof before publishing his own because we assume that the speaker is presenting his narrative in an orderly manner, which usually involves making its order correspond to that of the reported events. Because this is a general rule of good conversational conduct, we are entitled to expect a speaker not to depart from it without signalling the departure ('Meanwhile, back at the ranch . . ', 'Before all this . . '). In the absence of such a signal, we are inclined and entitled to infer that the narrative order matches the order of the narrated events, which explains the temporal suggestion of the Lobatchewsky sentence, and of 'They got married and they had a baby' and the like.

P. 91), and speaks of ' . . the words that are responsible for conventional implicatures, that carry tone . . ' (p. 93). Dummett brought the word 'tone' into this, replacing words of Frege's that mean 'colouring' and 'illumination' (1973: 2, 83-8). It fits some of his examples—'dead' and 'deceased', 'sweat' and 'perspiration'—and countless others, such as 'defecate' and 'shit', 'intellectually challenged' and 'mentally retarded', and so on. These do perhaps involve a difference in what is implied or suggested, but that is not the heart of them; and Jackson was right to ignore them in his account of conventional implicature.

Levi (1996: 8-15) contends that most of us have misunderstood what Ramsey meant. This is part of a larger concern of Levi's with different things that may be going on when one reasons from premisses that are supposed 'for the sake of argument'. His formidable work on this topic has defeated me. I hope my main conclusions in this book are not undercut by it. The Ramsey test thesis does not hold for subjunctive conditionals. I think that if Yeltsin had been in control of Russia and of himself, Chechnya would have achieved independence peacefully; but for me this conditional does not pass the Ramsey test.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 21 votes